Tuesday 6 October 2026 · Before kickoff
27 picks were published for 2026-10-06. Everything below is what subscribers had in front of them at kickoff -- nothing held back, nothing edited after the fact. Results were posted the following morning.
We were on the goals here. Kazakhstan and Faroe Islands had turned their recent meetings into open games — 3 of the last 4 had gone past 1.5. At 1.55 that was a short one.
We fancied this one to open up. Close to the market's own view. At 2.00 it was a fair price.
We were on the goals here. Albania and San Marino had turned their recent meetings into open games — 3 of the last 4 had gone past 2.5. At 1.17 that was a short one.
We were backing Luxembourg at home. They looked the stronger side to us in this one, and at 2.30 it was decent value for the call. Close to the market's own view.
We called this one as a low-scoring game. Close to the market's own view. At 2.02 it was a fair price.
We fancied this one to open up. Close to the market's own view. At 2.38 it was decent value.
We fancied this one to open up. A price that drifted our way. At 2.13 it was decent value.
We fancied this one to open up. A price that drifted our way. At 1.82 it was a fair price.
We were backing Switzerland at home. They looked the stronger side to us in this one, and at 1.12 it was a short one for the call. A price that drifted our way.
We called this one as a low-scoring game. A price that drifted our way. At 2.27 it was decent value.
We called this one as a low-scoring game. A price that drifted our way. At 2.21 it was decent value.
We were on the goals here. The recent head-to-head between Belarus and Finland pointed to a lively one, and at 1.54 it was a short one for the Over 1.5.
We were on Macclesfield Town to take this one on the road. At 2.38 it was decent value for the away win. A price that drifted our way.
We called this one as a low-scoring game. A price that drifted our way. At 1.94 it was a fair price.
We called this one as a low-scoring game. A price that drifted our way. At 1.93 it was a fair price.
We fancied this one to open up. Close to the market's own view. At 2.04 it was a fair price.
We fancied this one to open up. A modest edge on our numbers. At 2.46 it was decent value.
We fancied this one to open up. A modest edge on our numbers. At 2.24 it was decent value.
We called this one as a low-scoring game. Close to the market's own view. At 2.06 it was a fair price.
We fancied this one to open up. A price that drifted our way. At 1.80 it was a fair price.
We were on the goals here. The recent head-to-head between Internacional and Corinthians pointed to a lively one, and at 2.18 it was decent value for the Over 2.5.
We were on the quiet side here. Avai and Londrina had kept their recent meetings tight — 3 of the last 4 had stayed under 4.5. At 1.20 that was a short one.
We were on the goals here. The recent head-to-head between Remo and Grêmio pointed to a lively one, and at 1.91 it was a fair price for the Over 2.5.
We were on the goals here. The recent head-to-head between Vitoria and Chapecoense pointed to a lively one, and at 1.91 it was a fair price for the Over 2.5.
We were on the goals here. The recent head-to-head between Vila Nova and Cuiabá pointed to a lively one, and at 2.56 it was decent value for the Over 2.5.
We were on the goals here. The recent head-to-head between Botafogo and Vasco da Gama pointed to a lively one, and at 1.83 it was a fair price for the Over 2.5.
We were on the quiet side here. Cruzeiro and Sao Paulo had kept their recent meetings tight — 3 of the last 4 had stayed under 4.5. At 1.20 that was a short one.
| Picks published | 27 |
| Locked at kickoff | 27 |
NOVELTY publishes sports analysis and predictions. We are not a bookmaker. Nothing here is financial advice, and no outcome is guaranteed. Bet only what you can afford to lose. 18+.